![]() ![]() Perhaps the most obvious one is that MongoDB is a NoSQL database, while MySQL only responds to commands written in SQL. ![]() *Note this independent benchmark report was commissioned by Couchbase.MongoDB and MySQL are similar in some ways, but they also have some obvious differences.Read the full NoSQL DBaaS benchmarking report with many more details from Altoros.Learn more about Couchbase Cloud NoSQL DBaaS and start testing your own workloads today.Comparatively, the query engine of Couchbase Cloud supports aggregation, filtering, and JOIN operations without the need to model data for each specific query, ensuring a good level of scalability across all of these operations. MongoDB Atlas produced decent results, but fell short on JOIN operations for sharded collections out of the box:Īmazon DynamoDB also performed well on certain workloads but throws exceptions when read/write operations exceed the predetermined capacities which resulted in a large volume of failed operations in certain workloads. The results are in – best performing document storeĪcross the board, Altoros’ performance benchmark found Couchbase Cloud to be the best performing document store DBaaS available. On each type of cluster, Amazon DynamoDB had 40% of failed update operations and almost 1% of failed read operations. Here is one of the workloads compared in the report – for the three cluster sizes, measuring throughput and latency:įigure 4.1.3 Performance results under Workload A on 6-, 9-, and 18-node clustersĪmazon DynamoDB had unstable results because it produced a great number of failed operations. As with the pagination workload, Amazon DynamoDB was ineligible to compete due to the nature of its indexing process. Couchbase Cloud posted higher throughput with 750 ops/sec on 6-node clusters, compared with 100 ops/sec for MongoDB Atlas. In the final workload category, the results once again favored Couchbase Cloud. Meanwhile, Amazon DynamoDB was unable to compete entirely: its indexing process works in such a way that requires complex full table scans, which took too long for this workload, returning time-out errors. Despite the similar results, Couchbase Cloud was still able to outperform MongoDB Atlas across all cluster sizes on this workload. Both returned similar results on a 6-node cluster and a 9-node cluster, where throughput was low since the size of the dataset and indexes doubled. The results for the third workload were more balanced between MongoDB Atlas and Couchbase Cloud. While MongoDB Atlas performed well here, growing efficiently as more shards were added, Couchbase Cloud demonstrated the best results with a gradual increase in operations per second, as well as the lowest and most stable latency. When measured on a short-range scan workload, Couchbase Cloud again stood out. While it posted similar results as Amazon DynamoDB when measured on a 6-node cluster, Couchbase Cloud stood out on 9-node and 18-node clusters with latency times of less than a millisecond. For the first, update-heavy workload, Couchbase Cloud demonstrated low latency times across all cluster sizes. While each of the three DBaaS offerings had its strengths and weaknesses, across every workload test Couchbase Cloud emerged as the most robust of the three. So how did the three DBaaS providers compare? Head-to-head on NoSQL query workloads Finally, the fourth workload was a JOIN query with grouping and ordering applied. The second performed a short-range scan, involving 95 percent scans and 5 percent updates, while the third workload represented a pagination query with a single filtering option to which an offset and limit were applied. The first was update-heavy, invoking 50 percent reads and 50 percent updates of the data. To make the tests as comprehensive as possible, the workloads varied substantially. Its aim was to measure the relative performance in terms of latency and throughput that each database can achieve, by examining performance on three different cluster configurations – 6, 9, and 18 nodes – as well as under four different workloads. In its latest NoSQL performance benchmark report, Altoros has provided a comparative analysis of three NoSQL DBaaS offerings: Couchbase Cloud, MongoDB Atlas, and Amazon DynamoDB. This blog will summarize the comparison of three of the leading DBaaS, NoSQL solutions.Īltoros is a global IT service provider that has been comparing databases for 2 decades. As enterprises accelerate their digital transformation journeys, the need to quickly and efficiently scale their database infrastructure to meet increased processing demands has driven the adoption of DBaaS solutions. The COVID-19 pandemic has substantially increased the pace of digitization, and for many organizations, data demands have never been higher.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |